Tuesday, September 28, 2021

Plagiarism among Thai Students: A Study of Attitudes and Subjective Norms

https://tinyurl.com/53c6zrew

Abstract- For Thailand’s schools, colleges, and universities, academic misconduct continues to be one of the most significant challenges. Since the start of the COVID pandemic in March 2020 the use of the internet, digital platforms, and eLearning has dramatically increased. This sudden explosion in online learning presents huge challenges in curtailing the temptations for engaging in plagiarism. The internet provides ample opportunities for Thai students to access a wealth of information without visiting a school or university library. While easy access to the internet has led to a boom in searching for information, it has also made it much easier for students to plagiarize content they come across. Most Thai schools, colleges, and universities have created a policy to curb plagiarism to uphold academic integrity. Since Thai students are very weak in English language proficiency there is a tolerance for copying from the internet. This study is based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) underpinned as a predictive model of academic dishonesty which explains behavior as a final act of logical thinking. Attitudes are the pre-requisites in formulating convictions and normative beliefs which are referred to as subjective norms cultivated from the positive and negative attitudes about plagiarism which students get from society. This study also provides measures to combat plagiarism in Thai institutions.

Keywords- English as Foreign Language (EFL), English Proficiency Index (EPI), Medium of Instruction (MoI), Plagiarism, Thailand

A. Statement of the problem 

In Thailand, the first case of plagiarism was publicly announced in 2008 when 80 percent of plagiarism was reported in a doctoral thesis [12]. 

J. Fernquest and D. Mala. "Plagiarism: Warnings after university thesis plagiarism revealed." Bangkok Post. https://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/advanced/957873/plagiarism-warnings-after-university-thesis-plagiarism-revealed

Thereafter, it has been in the forefront attention of academics. Although, some universities had attempted to address this problem, still the problem exists widely among Thai students [6]. Many studies revealed that Thai students could neither understand the concept of plagiarism nor how to do proper citations and most of them lack critical thinking and academic writing skills [9] [27]. On the basis of this background the current study was initiated to find out the attitude of Thai students towards plagiarism. Is the habit of plagiarizing a cultural problem or it is because of inadequate control measures? Are Thai school, colleges and universities supportive in deterring plagiarism practices? These crucial issues are investigated through primary survey data and its analysis.

Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review

 Abstract

Intensified pressure to publish is a hallmark of a rapidly evolving higher education field where the faculty of any hue cannot avoid the ‘publish or perish’ treadmill. Growing need to publish more and to do so fast have resulted in the proliferation of pseudo scholarly publications many regards as ‘predatory’. This article provides a systematic review of research studies on so-called ‘predatory’ publishing, a new but fast-growing area of research, with a particular focus on the awareness of prospective authors about so-called ‘predatory’ publishing, the profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and the causal factors encouraging authors to publish in such outlets. It synthetizes the results of research studies on the topic to identify gaps and trends in the existing knowledgebase to guide further research. Results indicate so-called ‘predatory’ articles are authored by scholars from all fields and levels of academic experience rather than by inexperienced scholars only and ‘predatory’ contributions are not limited to developing countries, suggesting geographical location and author experience fail to explain the author profile of ‘predatory’ articles. Findings of this review suggest causal factors include research evaluation policies and publication pressure that emerge from the research environment in which scholars operate authors’ limited capacity to publish in ‘legitimate’ journals and conventions of so-called ‘predatory’ publishers. This indicates meaningful action might address all these factors in combination, rather than focus on them in isolation.

SJRQ2-Journal of Management Information and Decision Science (JMIDS)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Review coming..

Please read the SJR portal author comments about this journal before you submit your paper and pay the APC!











15247252, 15325806
WOS/ISI: NO
Beall List: The publisher (with name changes) was placed on the Beall list many years ago.

Editor-in-Chief

Chair Professor Wing-Keung Wong

Department of Finance, College of Management, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan. Email: decisionscience@businessjournals.org











Recent papers:

OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY OF RUBBER FARMERS’ COOPERATIVES IN THE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES (SEZs) OF THAILAND: A TWO-STAGE DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA) APPROACH

AJR Comments: This journal is more expensive than Heliyon ($1.750, SJRQ1, WOS indexed). The publisher is also reported to be owned by OMICS (very notorious) and was placed on the Beall List many years ago. However, if these things are not important to you, and you need a Q2 journal for academic rank which has not been discontinued by Scopus (not yet), send them your paper. I am sure it will be published. 


Saturday, September 25, 2021

Experts question China’s bid to create world-class journals

"Scientists always prefer to publish in the world’s top journals over domestic ones."

4 September 2019

Hepeng Jia

https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/experts-question-chinas-bid-create-world-class-journals

Earlier this month, four Chinese government agencies issued a five-point plan to boost its development of academic journals, including proposals for English language titles and scientific publishing groups.

The document, published on 16 August, was approved last year by the country’s most powerful policy-making body, the Central Comprehensively Deepening Reforms Commission of the Communist Party of China, headed by President Xi Jinping.

It commits to:

  • boosting the development of Chinese language science journals;
  • further supporting locally published English journals to become world leading;
  • forming domestic science journal publishing groups;
  • increasing digitization of journal contents; and
  • attracting global talents to manage China's journals.

Although it did not mention budgets, the report promised to increase the weight of locally published journals, in English and Chinese, in China’s research evaluation and faculty assessment.

“As China is a major contributor and consumer of scientific publications, the move is aimed to increase our influence in the market,” says Fan Jingquan, director of the Center for Journal Management at Huazhong Agricultural University, based in Wuhan, central China.

“A new set of corresponding policies in funding and research evaluation should be enacted soon.”

Shi Yongchao, chief managing editor of Research, an open access multidisciplinary Chinese journal based in Beijing and published in partnership with Science magazine, questions the efficacy of the new policy.

“It’s questionable how the higher weight of domestic journals in the evaluation system can be realized, as scientists always prefer to publish in the world’s top journals over domestic ones if they have good research,” he says,

He adds that the inaccessibility of Chinese language journals to international scholars makes it even harder for Chinese scientists to consider publishing their important research in them.

Wang Jiafeng, an associate professor at South China Agricultural University, says that international journals have more objective evaluation criteria than their Chinese counterparts, and for this reason Chinese scientists often prefer publishing internationally, at least in the short term.

“Even if research institutions give higher weight to Chinese language journals in their faculty assessment, it doesn’t work, because this runs contrary to scientists’ desire to absorb advanced international experience through publication,” Wang told Nature Index.

According to the latest Institute of Science and Technology Information of China (ISTIC) annual report, Chinese scientists published more than 360,000 papers included in the Science Citation Index (SCI) in 2017.

For the past nine years, China has been the world’s second largest producer of scientific papers after the United States, which published more than 524,000 papers in 2017.

This reflects the Nature Index rankings, which places China below the US in terms of high-quality research output. Between March 2018 and February 2019, China published 15,320 papers in the 82 journals tracked by the Nature Index, and the US published 27,472.

But by the end of 2017, only 173 Chinese journals have been indexed by SCI, of the roughly 3,800 total. Just 46 of them entered the first quartile for their disciplines, according to impact factor.

Read next:

Publishing standards help fight bias against Chinese authors

The hidden cost of having a eureka moment, but not being able to put it in your own words

China: Quality deficit belies the hype

Friday, September 24, 2021

ResearchGate Removes 200,000 ‘Infringing’ Files After Takedown Tidal Wave

The academic community platform ResearchGate has removed 200,000 files in response to a wave of copyright complaints from publishers ACS and Elsevier. The takedowns go against ResearchGate's open-access philosophy but, legally, it saw no other option than to comply. 

One of the core pillars of academic research is sharing. By letting other researchers know what you do, ideas are criticized, improved upon, and extended.

Unfortunately, it’s not always easy for academics to share their work. Most of the top publications are monetized by major publishers, which means that they are locked behind a paywall.

To make their work easier to access, many researchers place copies of their work on their personal profiles, often hosted by their university. There are also more organized ways to share research, by using ResearchGate for example.

ResearchGate

Based in Germany, ResearchGate promotes itself as a professional network for scientists and researchers. The site claims 20 million members, who use the platform to “share, discover, and discuss research.”

In addition to simply connecting to other academics, the site also allows members to share ‘their’ publications. While many see this as a great feature, some academic publishers are not pleased with this activity.

Researchers often share articles they have written themselves but they don’t necessarily own the rights. This is because most of the top publications ask the authors to sign away all of their copyrights if they want their papers to be published.

Take Down 200,000 Files

This is also true for Elsevier and the American Chemical Society (ACS), which overloaded ResearchGate with takedown requests recently. The site is certainly not a newcomer when it comes to copyright infringement complaints but the scope of the most recent takedown wave is something different.

“[T]he demands by Elsevier and ACS resulted in the removal of around 200,000 public files. In the context of a community of over 20 million researchers this is unfortunate, rather than existential, but it has sparked an acute reaction from many of our members who believe in the importance of open science,” ResearchGate writes.

The platform’s ultimate mission is to make research “open to all.” Therefore, ResearchGate is disappointed to see all of this knowledge being removed from the site. However, it saw no other option than to comply.

ResearchGate Seeks Cooperation

The publishers will have the law on their site in most cases. However, ResearchGate doesn’t believe that the takedowns are in the best interest of science. It would have preferred to cooperate instead.

“The decision by Elsevier and ACS to simply remove content is disappointing to the entire research community, not just because of the loss to science and researchers, but because there is a better way.”

ResearchGate has already partnered with other publishers such as Springer Nature and Wiley, who use the site’s network to reach a broader audience. These companies publish their content on the platform as part of a syndication agreement.

Many academics and researchers are disappointed that their work has been removed over copyright claims and some are plain angry. However, ResearchGate’s hands are tied.

Questionable Takedowns?

Interestingly, the platform also heard from researchers who had content removed that should have remained online. Because the rights were already bought out, for example, or when files are in the public domain.

Some researchers even said that they never transferred their copyrights to the publishers, which would mean that they have no say over the matter. ResearchGate can’t independently verify these claims but the organization sees them as a serious concern.

The present legal environment forces ResearchGate to simply take content offline. And enforcement is only expected to get stricter, as the platform is implementing an upload filter system, to prevent researchers from sharing content they don’t own the rights to. This can include their own publications.

In closing, ResearchGate urges its users not to upload content without permission or in violation of licensing terms. At the same time, the platform hopes that publishers will recognize the potential of the site and seek collaboration where possible.

“To all publishers: the future of academic publishing is open. Let’s work together to unlock its true potential,” ResearchGate writes.

This isn’t the first time that ResearchGate has squared off with major publishers. The company was also sued by Elsevier and ACS three years ago and this case remains ongoing. It’s possible that the recent takedown spree is, at least indirectly, linked to that lawsuit.

SJRQ2-Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues (JLERI)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

 Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues

15440036, 15440044

WOS/ISI: NO

Allied Academies is on the Beall List (they changed names but address is the same).

JLERI Journal jleri.abacademies.org@gmail.com

AJR Comments: Before you consider sending your paper and $1,500 USD to this journal, you need to read author comments about the journal on the SJR portal site. Go to the bottom of the page,


Sent from: JLERI Journal jleri.abacademies.org@gmail.com

Dear Researchers,

You are invited to submit your paper to "Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issue" (ISSN: 15440036, 15440044). This is Scopus indexed Q2 journal.

Scope: Papers with the following subjects are accepted;
  1. Law, Sociology and Political Science
  2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  3. Business, Management and Accounting
Publication Time: Papers will be published in August 2021.
Paper Fee: 1500 USD.
Send us your papers at: jleri.abacademies.org@gmail.com

Kind regards

--

Editor

Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues

Journal: https://www.abacademies.org/journals/journal-of-legal-ethical-and-regulatory-issues-home.html

Scimago: https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=19700173245&tip=sid&clean=0

Scopushttps://www.scopus.com/sourceid/19700173245?origin=resultslist#tabs=1


Allied Business Academies

40 Bloomsbury Way Lower Ground Floor

London, United Kingdom

WC1A 2SE


Thursday, September 23, 2021

China (PRC) and Wiley do publishing deal


How academic publishers profit from the publish-or-perish culture

China's Higher Education Press and global publisher Wiley sign partnership agreement

By Wang Yiming 
http://www.china.org.cn/arts/2021-09/21/content_77765560.htm

 Higher Education Press (HEP), one of China's largest and most renowned educational publishers, signed a strategic partnership agreement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Wiley), a multinational publishing company and leader in research and education, during the 28th Beijing International Book Fair (BIBF) held Sept. 14 to 18 in Beijing.

The agreement was signed by Su Yuheng, president of HEP, and Philip Kisray, senior vice president and general manager of Wiley.

The agreement paves the way for the two parties to cooperate in three major areas including academic journal publishing and scientific research services, book copyright trade and digitization.

Together, they will build a high-quality repository of English-language academic journals with global influence, solidifying the international reputation of digital teaching platforms that provide first-class content, and developing a system for sharing scientific research.


Su Yuheng, president of HEP, and Philip Kisray, senior vice president and general manager of Wiley, sign a strategic partnership agreement on Sept. 15 in Beijing. [Photo courtesy of Higher Education Press]


Su said that when it comes to education publishing, academic publishing, and online education and related services, HEP is eager to explore a new frontier in information technology.

He said that for more than three decades, HEP and Wiley have fostered a collaborative partnership in the copyright sector based on mutual respect and that this next step signals an opportunity to build a community with a shared future of mankind.


Su Yuheng, president of HEP, delivers a speech at the signing ceremony, on Sept. 15 in Beijing. [Photo courtesy of Higher Education Press]


"Promoting scientific and technological innovation is the core strategy of China's 14th Five-Year Plan," said Kisray. "Academic titles remain a vital form of dissemination carriers of scholarly publication, playing a crucial role promoting exchanges and progress in science and technology."

According to Kisray, in the past year, a total of 176 Chinese academic journals have been included in SCI, however, compared with the number of published Chinese papers, China's English STM journals still "have enormous potential in growth."

"We see today as the beginning of what we believe will be a long-term and transformative strategic partnership between China's prestigious premier comprehensive publishing house, HEP, and Wiley, a leading research and education publisher in the world. We believe that this combination of a strong journal publishing global network and continuous technology advancement of a world-leading platform will strengthen HEP's social and academic influence in China and across the world," he added.

Philip Kisray, senior vice president and general manager of Wiley, delivers a speech at the signing ceremony on Sept. 15 in Beijing. [Photo courtesy of Higher Education Press]
Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

SJRQ3-JOURNAL OF EASTERN EUROPEAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH (JEECAE)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
JOURNAL OF EASTERN EUROPEAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH (JEECAE)

Review coming...


THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF SERVICE RECOVERY PERFORMANCE OF FRONTLINE EMPLOYEES: A STUDY OF VIETNAM RETAILING INDUSTRY

Monday, September 13, 2021

University of Toronto discontinues use of Turnitin, Bb Collaborate

U of T recently decided to make some changes to the programs they use for online learning, including terminating their use of Turnitin, a plagiarism detection service, and Blackboard Collaborate (Bb Collaborate), a web conferencing tool.

U of T will now use Ouriginal, a plagiarism detection service similar to Turnitin, which is integrated directly into Quercus. The change follows a report that found an increase in reported academic offences at U of T last year, which the report partially attributes to the COVID-19 pandemic and the move to online learning. 

SEE ALSO: Turnitin to acquire Sweden's Ouriginal

AJR's comments: Monopolies are good for business. Every publisher owner knows that.

Abandoning of Turnitin

U of T’s switch from Turnitin to Ouriginal took effect on September 1. According to Vice-Provost Academic Programs Susan McCahan, the change occurred following the end of the university’s contract with Turnitin, which meant U of T could explore other options for plagiarism detection. 

“Ouriginal meets our pedagogical, functional, privacy and fiscal requirements,” McCahan stated, explaining that the software is “a similarity detection solution that combines text-matching, with writing-style analysis to promote academic integrity and help prevent plagiarism.”  

Ouriginal can also check for similarities between newly submitted work and previous work from the same academic course. According to an announcement from the Academic & Collaborative Technologies Group, community consultations with instructors indicated that the ability to check submitted work against previously submitted work was important, to prevent what they describe as “hand-me-down assignments.” 

According to the announcement, Ouriginal is able to compare new submissions with large bodies of old work — including, in some cases, work submitted anytime in the past 15 years. 

Since Ouriginal is accessed via Quercus, there will be no major changes to the way that instructors and students interact with assignment submissions. This means that work submitted over Quercus is analyzed by Ouriginal software without the student submitting the work directly through Ouriginal, similar to how Turnitin has worked in the past. 

The changes come amid an increase in reported academic offences committed by students, which, according to last year’s report on academic misconduct, rose by 35 per cent in the 2019–2020 academic year. 

In a report on academic integrity, an advisory group noted that this increase may be related to the pandemic and the associated transition to online learning, which has resulted in U of T having to lean heavily on academic integrity software given the loss of in-person proctoring. 

Termination of Bb Collaborate

Due to another supplier contract expiration, U of T will also stop using the webinar software Bb Collaborate for classes and meetings. Termination of its use took effect on August 31. Professors can still use alternate solutions for virtual courses, like Microsoft Teams and Zoom Education, while the university completes a procurement process.

Since the decision to terminate Bb Collaborate occurred close to the beginning of the fall term, some instructors found the change abrupt. Avi Hyman, U of T’s director of academic technology, sent an email apologizing to previous Bb Collaborate users for any potential miscommunication. 

“We have received some direct feedback about these changes from instructors, ranging from very positive feelings about the changes to some concern,” wrote McCahan. “To mitigate any concerns and to assist with the transition, we have put in place additional support for instructors, including additional staffing, enhanced documentation, and training through the Centre for Teaching Support & Innovation and divisional [Educational Technology] offices.”

In an email to The Varsity, Michael Dennison, a sessional instructor in the Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, wrote that he chose to use Bb Collaborate because it was integrated with Quercus, but that it didn’t offer the same features as some other programs. He added that he believes the change will not have much effect on students, since there are other programs available. 

https://thevarsity.ca/2021/09/12/u-of-t-discontinues-use-of-turnitin-bb-collaborate/

SJRQ1-Journal of Asia Business Studies (JABS)

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

 

Journal Name: Journal of Asia Business Studies

Short name: JABS

Subject Area and Category:

Business, Management and Accounting

Business and International Management

Strategy and Management

Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Country: United Kingdom

Review date: 2021.09.14 Updated:

SJR Quartile: SJRQ1

WOS/ISI: YES

ISSN:15587894, 15592243

Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

Email:

APC: We have a single rate APC of £2,495/$3,370/€2,880 for publishing in a hybrid or fully open access journal.

Editor(s):

  • Editor-in-Chief

  • Deputy Editor

    • Dr Deeksha Singh
      Rutgers University - USA
  • Associate Editor

    • Dr Punit Arora
      City University of New York - USA
    • Dr Asda Chintakananda
      NIDA Business School, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) - Thailand
    • Dr Sonjaya S. Gaur
      NYU School of Professional Studies, New York University - USA
    • Dr Yufei Huang
      Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin - Ireland
  • Consulting Editor

    • Professor Hari Bapuji
      University of Melbourne - Australia
    • Professor Sir Cary L. Cooper
      The University of Manchester - UK
    • Professor Manlio Del Giudice
      University of Rome Link Campus - Italy
    • Professor Vikas Kumar
      University of Sydney - Australia
    • Professor Tomoki Sekiguchi
      Kyoto University - Japan
  • Beall Listed: No

    Scopus Discontinued List: No

    Frequency:

    Template: Articles should be between 3000  and 10000 words in length. This includes all text, for example, the structured abstract, references, all text in tables, and figures and appendices. 

    Please allow 350 words for each figure or table.

    Style: Harvard

    Copyright:

    Similarity threshold:

    Submission process:

    Journal Web Page Comments:

    Sample Papers:

    Rungruangjit, W. and Charoenpornpanichkul, K. (2023), "What motivates consumers’ continued usage intentions of food delivery applications in post-COVID-19 outbreak? Comparing Generations X, Y and Z", Journal of Asia Business Studies, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-06-2023-0234

    Factors influencing adoption of payments banks by Indian customers: extending UTAUT with perceived credibility - https://tinyurl.com/2xk4fjy9

    AJR comments: Expensive.





    Friday, September 10, 2021

    International Architectural Sciences and Application Symposium-Isparta, Turkey - October 27 - 29, 2021

     







    Dear Researcher
    We are honored to announce the  International Architectural Sciences and Application Symposium and invite you to this meeting on October 27-29, 2021 by IKSAD Institute (Institute of Economic Development and Social Research), via Online participation 
    Warm regards
    Dr. Mustafa Latif EMEK
    Chairman of Institute


    Disciplines
    Architecture, Design
    Engineering, Culture, History

    Symposium Web Site

    https://www.izdas.org/arch

    Free charge of participation
    Free charge of presentation
    Free charge of publication
    Free charge of certificates


    Calendar
    Abstract submission deadline: September 20, 2021
    Program announcement: October 1, 2021 (program includes zoom ID and password)

    Conference email adres: 
    architecturalsymposium@gmail.com

    Application and registration steps
    1- Send your abstract to 
    architecturalsymposium@gmail.com until September 20, 2021 (word/doc)
    2- If your abstract is accepted by referee you will receive an acceptance mail
    3- Your registration will be done automatically
    4- Programme will be announcement in October 1, 2021 on web site (check your name at programme)
    5- Join in meeting via zoom, make your presentation
    6- After your presentation you will receive your certificate


    Contact: architecturalsymposium@gmail.com

    This conference is organized by IKSAD Institute of Economic Development and Social Research of Turkey 


     






    İzinsiz Gönderim Bildir
    Üyelikten Ayrıl
    Bu mesaj size euro.message aracı hizmet sağlayıcısı kullanılarak iletilmiştir.

    Thursday, September 9, 2021

    The use of questionnaires from 1996–2019: Increasing but is the quality?

     Questionnaires mentioned in academic research 1996–2019: Rapid increase but declining citation impact

    Ruth Fairclough and Mike Thelwall

    Free to read paper.

    Abstract

    Questionnaires are a device to elicit human perspectives, self-reports or

    knowledge. This article investigates which broad academic fields use ques-

    tionnaires, whether this use is increasing, and whether it generates aver-

    age citation impact. This is investigated through a nonprobability sample:

    articles mentioning questionnaires in their titles, abstracts, or keywords.

    This procedure captures a minority of research using questionnaires, with

    substantial biases against fields using alternative terminology, such as

    ‘instrument’ or ‘survey’, or that rarely explicitly mention questionnaires in

    titles, abstract or keywords because they play a minor role. The results

    suggest that the proportion of journal articles using questionnaires tripled

    between 1996 and 2019, and this proportion increased in all 27 broad

    Scopus elds. Over the same period, the citation impact of the identified

    research declined from above average to below average. Thus, whilst aca-

    demic research seems to be increasingly using questionnaires, the quality

    or scholarly value of research using questionnaires may be declining.

    These are tentative conclusions because of the unknown sampling bias for

    the set of questionnaire-based articles analysed.



    Cheats! Cheats! Everywehre!

    RWANDA - Academic dishonesty: Students, staff should be trained early
    https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20210825152229460

    Despite efforts by universities and higher learning institutions to fight a lack of integrity among students, academic and administrative staff, the issue remains challenging, and experts call for concerted efforts to root out the problem.


    More than 100 students at the private KIM University (KIMU) in Kigali, Rwanda, were barred from graduating in July 2021 after authorities detected that they had changed grades on the university system, prompting investigations by the Rwanda Investigation Bureau (RIB).

    Rachel Kayisengerwa, the owner of KIMU, who took over after her husband, Peter, the founder, died last year, confirmed the incident and stressed that, under no circumstances, could the students graduate as they allegedly “stole” marks. Their cases and those of others who might also have been involved will be investigated.

    KIMU closed its doors in December 2020 citing financial constraints, but final-year students were allowed to graduate.

    According to RIB spokesperson Dr Thierry Murangira, some forms of academic dishonesty constitute crimes and are punishable by Rwandan laws.

    Commenting on the recent case at KIMU, Murangira said that preliminary investigations revealed that the initial grades of 108 students were changed and that academic and other staff members might have been involved.

    “The investigation shows that the number of students who had their grades changed is quite high. This affected both the students and those in charge of the management information system. The investigation is still ongoing to ascertain if there were any bribes involved,” he said.

    He said the suspects are accused of electronically forging the documents, which carries heavy sentences. They could face sentences of five to seven years in prison and fines ranging from RWF3 million (about US$3,000) to RWF5 million.

    Several cases under investigation

    A senior lecturer at the private University of Kigali was dismissed in mid-July 2021 over alleged sexual harassment linked to student marks. At the University of Rwanda, a senior lecturer in the School of Journalism and Communication was allegedly subjected to sexual harassment. The RIB says the case is still under investigation.

    These are some examples of malpractice or academic dishonesty observed at different universities in the country. Experts warn that academic dishonesty is a vice that undermines excellence and can affect the quality of education expected from the universities.

    According to Professor Nelson Ijumba, a former vice-chancellor of academics and research at the University of Rwanda (UR), and emeritus professor of electrical engineering at UR, who is also an honorary professor of electrical engineering at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, there are several types of academic dishonesty that need to be fought and uprooted.

    “Academic dishonesty includes staff forging certificates they don’t have, or data for academic publication; lecturers who do research with students and publishing alone, and forged degrees,” he told University World News.

    The seasoned academic added that other forms of academic dishonesty are manifested in lecturers selling marks and those who offer marks in exchange of sexual favours.

    “Such practices are known in many institutions, not only in Rwanda. These are issues university managers should deal with harshly, otherwise it will be difficult to uphold integrity and the quality of education will be compromised,” he said.

    Dishonesty affects labour capacity

    According to Dr Fidele Ndahayo, the vice-chancellor of the University of Technology and Arts of Byumba, a private university in Northern Province, Rwanda, academic dishonesty happens due to a lack of integrity among university management, teaching and administrative staff, as well as among students.

    “It is something that we have been fighting with all our might. However, due to a lack of academic integrity, the problem persists. Greater efforts are needed to fight it,” he said.

    Ndahayo noted that, while universities have national, international, and internal laws and regulations, they must be vigilant if they want to eradicate the problem.

    Christine Osae, the director of faculty development and quality assurance at Davis College in Kigali, Rwanda, concurs that academic dishonesty occurs when the people involved in the process of teaching and learning operate without integrity. She stressed that academic dishonesty has a huge effect on the labour capacity in a country and worldwide.

    “Imagine a world where your surgeon is only a surgeon because he cheated; a situation where a vaccine like one of the COVID-19 vaccines’ efficacy was determined by falsified data; or employing a half-baked architect to put up a 10-storey commercial building that would house thousands of people per day,” she said.

    She added that academic dishonesty completely undermines the role of education in creating lifelong learners agile enough to apply creative, out-of-the-box solutions to the world’s most pressing issues.

    “Students who cheat are testament to the fact that no learning is taking place because they cannot apply what has been learned – much less learn how to learn. In addition, forms of dishonesty like fabrication of research data may misinform decisions leading to colossal damages in every sphere,” Osae said.

    She emphasised that universities must take a stand to tackle the issue effectively and urged universities to include both staff and students when they address academic dishonesty.

    Students, Osae said, should be encouraged to work hard, understanding that failure is not an unbearable thing but rather a learning process.

    “When students join our institutions, we slap them with academic integrity policies to sign and, when they flout the academic rules, we immediately apply punitive measures underpinned by the zero-tolerance approach,” she said.

    But many students never learned about academic honesty and its importance at school. “How should they avoid plagiarism if we have not taught them how to build an argument, weave narratives off people’s opinions or attribute information to sources?”

    “Academic dishonesty is also practised because the perpetrators (both students and academics) can get away with it. How many institutions have anti-plagiarism software at undergraduate level?” she asked.

    Inspections and reviews

    According to Dr Rose Mukankomeje, director general of Rwanda’s Higher Education Council, the government has put in place laws and regulations and there are other established academic guidelines such as general academic regulations universities and higher learning institutions (HLI) should comply with.

    “Universities and HLI not complying with the established laws, quality standards and guidelines promote academic dishonesty,” she told University World News.

    She added that the Higher Education Council conducts a periodic institutional audit and subject review, among other inspections, to ensure the established laws and policies are not violated.

    This is in line with its mission to enhance the quality of education, the modes of providing it within higher learning institutions and to make sure that graduates from such institutions are known for the betterment of Rwandans’ welfare and the development of Rwanda.

    She noted that all higher learning institutions are aware of the existing laws, standards, policies, and guidelines for higher education, and they are required to comply. 

    Turnitin to acquire Sweden's Ouriginal

    Turnitin is set to reinforce its dominance as the biggest provider of anti-plagiarism software to universities in Australia, through a proposed takeover of competitor Ouriginal.

    The move has put the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) on high alert, as it raises concerns that Turnitin is “buying out its most promising competitive threat to protect its market position,” as Ouriginal is one of just two competitors in Turnitin’s market.

    Turnitin is the University of Sydney’s choice for anti-plagiarism software, and is by far the largest player in the market. The ACCC’s Statement of Issues says that Turnitin has “large databases that contain over 1.4 billion student papers” and “82 million scholarly subscription articles,” allowing it to comprehensively check student assignments against existing material.

    Ouriginal is “much smaller than Turnitin in Australia.” It currently services only a handful of higher education institutions such as the University of Canberra and Murdoch University. 

    Despite Turnitin’s current dominance, however, the ACCC says that Ouriginal could develop into a strong competitor to Turnitin if it does not merge.

    The ACCC is concerned that the takeover will “substantially lessen competition in an already highly concentrated market and may lead to higher prices or reduced service levels for the Australian higher education sector.”

    A third player, SafeAssign, is made by learning management software provider Blackboard, and is used by universities such as Griffith University, Torrens University, James Cook University and Queensland University of Technology.

    The ACCC contends that Turnitin’s size gives it a commercial advantage over other software providers, as it experiences “economies of scale” (cost savings that companies gain from being larger and running more efficiently) and “network effects” (benefits from more people using your service, like how social media companies benefit from more users).

    These lead to major “barriers to entry”, making it incredibly difficult for new entrants to successfully challenge Turnitin’s position.

    Turnitin’s takeover reflects a growing trend of universities spending big to crack down on “academic dishonesty” to preserve their reputations. In 2018, Turnitin introduced a new product based on machine learning, which monitors the writing styles of individual students, and flags content which shows a change in tone or voice.

    Students have previously expressed concerns over USyd’s “scare tactics” approach to contract cheating, arguing for a more nuanced understanding of why certain students are incentivised to cheat.

    “Universities are more than happy to spend money on anti-plagarism software over the quality of our education,” said Maddie Clark, SRC Education Officer, who also said that students should be concerned about data collection and privacy by anti-plagiarism software companies.

    “Instead of paying for these programs, the university should be investing in more real life staff members,” she said.

    The ACCC is yet to make a final decision on the acquisition.

    http://honisoit.com/2021/09/turnitin-set-to-take-over-competitor-dominate-anti-plagiarism-software-market/

    Tuesday, September 7, 2021

    6th World Research Summit for Hospitality and Tourism - 14-15 December 2021

     

    If you are unable to view this message correctly, click here

     
    6th World Research Summit for Tourism and Hospitality
     
    Register Today!
    Deadline:
    13 December 2021
     
    Keynote Speakers/ Panellists
     
    Join the mailing list
     
    Sponsor or Exhibit
     
    Supporting publications
    journalannals journaldestinataionmarketing
    journalhospitalitymanagement   journalhospitalitytourism
    journaltourismleisuresport   journaltourismmanagement
     

    New Keynote Speaker Announced

    Dear Colleague,

    We are delighted to announce that Chris Davidson, Executive Vice President, MMGY, USA, will be joining us as a Keynote Speaker at the 6th World Research Summit for Tourism and Hospitality.

    Chris Davidson
    Executive Vice President, MMGY Travel Intelligence, USA

    For an overview of the program please visit the website.

    The conference will provide an interactive, dynamic, and shared international conference platform for global academics and practitioners to discuss how to enhance research applications and knowledge management through resilience, adaptability, digital intelligence, innovation, and smart knowledge in shifting economies of scale.

    This summit also offers unique opportunities to unfold and embrace various repercussions of COVID-19 pandemic with various stakeholders, including academic researchers, industry professionals, and government officials, through dialogues on how to better utilize research outputs for the benefits of the industry, in a resilient, intelligent and innovative way.

    Please join us to be a part of this dynamic international platform where the most recent, state-of-the-art, academic research applications of changing global economy will be shared and discussed.


    Kind regards,

    Conference Chair 
    Youcheng WangRosen College of Hospitality Management, University of Central Florida, USA

    Scientific Committee Chair 
    Murat Kizildag, Associate Professor, Rosen College of Hospitality Management, University of Central Florida, USA

    Organised by  
    Elsevier Rosen-College-of-Hospitality-Management
    Elsevier

    Invitations to Elsevier Conferences - Offers & Invitations is a communication type sent to you by Elsevier STM Journals


    Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Limited All rights reserved. | Elsevier Privacy Policy
    Elsevier Limited, The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB UK