Rajarambapu Institute Of Technology
23492473, 23941707
How to publish in this journal
Style: APA in a double column template
APC: "There are no charges for submitting to or publishing in JEET."
Comments: A search turned up no Thai authored papers.
How to publish in this journal
02512513, 15731782
WOS/IS: Yes
The manuscript length should not exceed 7500 to 8000 words or 30 pages APA style.
Authors who choose to publish open access in International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance are required to pay an article-processing charge.
The APC for all published articles is as follows, subject to VAT or local taxes where applicable:
£1790.00/$2690.00/€2090.00
Visit our open access support portal for further information. Authors can also choose to publish under the traditional publishing model (no APC charges apply); both options will be offered after the paper has been accepted.
International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET)
Scopus: Yes
WOS/ISI: No
Beall list: No
How to publish in this journal
21978638, 21978646
Author guidelines:
Thai sample papers:
I n recent years in The Scholarly Kitchen we’ve had occasion to examine multiple kinds of academic dishonesty in the publishing world: “predatory” publishers who present unvetted research (some of which is literal nonsense) to the world as peer-reviewed science on behalf of paying authors; services that sell authorship and coauthorship attributions in published papers to people who had nothing to do with the papers’ creation; problems like citation cartels and peer-review spoofing.
About a week ago I found myself confronted by a new manifestation of this seemingly hydra-headed problem.
While conducting a periodic check of my email spam filter (the settings of which I don’t control, and which can sometimes be hyper-vigilant), I came across a message with the subject line “Book Review.” Thinking it might have been about a review of one of my books – and therefore with mild trepidation – I opened the message. I was a bit surprised to see that it was in fact an invitation to become a book reviewer for a “website for book reviewers and readers” that provides “insights and opinions on recently published scholarly books.” My name had apparently come to the publisher’s attention because I had written some articles indexed in Web of Science, and “in light of (my) professionalism” the sender expressed hope that I might join the enterprise as a reviewer, mentioning in passing a “great honorarium.”
I found this intriguing on two levels. First, I’ve been a freelance writer for years and I’m always open to hearing about a gig – even though the hours/dollars ratio involved in book reviewing is usually pretty low. But second, this communication had a weird fishiness to it, and since I have a well-documented morbid interest in deceptive scholarly publishing, that was what really piqued my interest. So I responded, expressing interest in learning more.
The sender got back to me quickly, explaining the model in more detail. She made it clear that the company she represented (which I’ll now simply refer to as The Company) was not in fact a publisher of book reviews, but rather an intermediary between book review authors and those who wished to get authorship credit for book reviews written by others. As I asked follow-up questions over the course of several email exchanges, the model gradually became clear:
Now even more intrigued, I asked for a copy of the agreement that I would be required to sign if I agreed to this arrangement. It was provided on condition of strict confidentiality, so I’ll abide by that agreement and won’t share any of its details here. (I’m also not sharing the name of The Company, given that some of the enterprises engaging in deceptive publishing practices have proven quite litigious in the past.) Here I’ll just say that the agreement laid out in somewhat greater detail the same arrangement that had been explained to me via email.
How is this different from the common practice (especially in biomedical journals) of “honorary,” “ghost,” “guest,” and “rolling” authorships? In fact, this practice is qualitatively quite similar to it. One important difference is that in the case of this particular service, the “ghost” author is presented as the sole author (or perhaps the partner of a single co-author), which is fundamentally more deceptive than when someone is listed as author #79 of 125 “authors.” Another difference is that in this scenario, the person receiving authorship credit is not only not the author of the article, but has no connection whatsoever with the actual author or with the process that resulted in the article. There is, in fact, no reason to believe that the person being credited with writing the review has even read the book under review. A third difference is the raw mercenary aspect of the arrangement: this model represents a simple and straightforward example of academic ghostwriting, undertaken for money by the actual author, with the intention of misrepresenting the published review as someone else’s work – a sort of reverse plagiarism in which the creator of the work sells credit for its creation to someone who had nothing to do with it.
How is this different from the also-common practice of ghostwriting books? It’s different because in this case, authorship is being used to confer academic advancement on one individual based on work done by another. If a movie star or politician publishes book that was actually written by someone else, the real-world impact isn’t the same as when a professor receives tenure based on a claim to have done academic work that was actually done by someone else. (This is really just a variation, specifically involving book reviews, on the Russian authorship-for-pay scam reported in the Kitchen last year by Anna Abalkina.)
Given that I’m not providing the name of the company involved and am not quoting directly the terms of its author agreement, how is this post useful to those who want to avoid this particular scam? My hope is that this piece will have three real-world effects:
One of the great things about humans is how inventive we are. One of the depressing things about humans is how often we apply our creativity to coming up with new ways to deceive and lie to each other. Sadly, I don’t see any reason to think this will be the last new variation on deceptive publishing that emerges in our scholarly communication ecosystem.
How to publish in this journal
Centro para la Investigacion en Sistemas Sostenibles de Produccion Agropecuari
Chemical composition and nutritional value of urea treated rice straw for ruminants
Energy Demand Modeling for the Eastern Economic Corridor ofThailand: A Case Study of Rayong Province
Chanidaporn Lunsamrong, Atit Tippichai* Department of Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Art, and Design, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand. *Email: atit.ti@kmitl.ac.th
How to publish in this journal
20500726, 20500734
Fashion, Style & Popular Culture is a peer-reviewed journal specifically dedicated to the area of fashion scholarship's interfacings with popular culture. It was established to provide an interdisciplinary environment for fashion academics and practitioners to publish innovative scholarship in all aspects of fashion and popular culture relating to design, textiles, production, promotion, consumption and appearance-related products and services.
Sponsored by Antoinette Westphal College of Media Arts & Design.
https://www.intellectbooks.com/submit/fashion-style-popular-culture
Please email manuscripts of 5000–8000 words to our editor Joseph H. Hancock, Ph.D. at joseph.h.hancock@drexel.edu.
References – Intellect requires the use of Harvard references embedded in the main text in the following format (Harper 1999: 27).
https://www.intellectbooks.com/asset/60063/1/NFC_FSPC.pdf
WOS/ISI: Yes
APC: AJET is open access, double blind peer reviewed, and has no publication charges.
Lead Editorial team
Associate Professor Linda Corrin, Deakin University, Australia
Professor Gwo-Jen Hwang, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Associate Professor Jason M Lodge, University of Queensland, Australia
Associate Professor Kate Thompson, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
STYLE:
Manuscripts are to be submitted in English, using spelling and punctuation as per the Oxford English Dictionary. In-text citations and references need to conform to the latest edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA style manual, 7th edition). Examples can be found on the APA site (http://www. apastyle.org/).
The usual length of an AJET article is between 5000 and 8000 words, including abstract, figures, tables and references, but occasionally lengths outside this range are accepted.
Sample papers:
Sleeman, J., Lang, C., & Dakich, E. (2020). Social media, learning and connections for international students: The disconnect between what students use and the tools learning management systems offer. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4384
There are no charges for any publication fees.
Country: Thailand
Publisher: Kasetsart University
ISSN: 01256726
WOS/ISI: Yes
Buffalo Bulletin is published quarterly in January-March, April-June, July-September and October-December. Contributions on any aspect of research or development, progress reports of projects and news on buffalo will be considered for publication in the bulletin
Start year: 1982
Language: English
Publication fee: Free of Charge
Free access: Immediate
Issues per year: 4 Issues (Quarterly)
Impact Factor (WOS) 2020: 0.172 (Q4)
SJR (SCOPUS) 2020: 0.231 (Q3)
ISSN : 0125-6726
eISSN : 1996-5696
Review coming...
WOS/ISI: YES
Editors: Joonmo Son and Eric C. Thompson
As of 2021, Asian Journal of Social Science will be published by Elsevier Science. The Asian Journal of Social Science is a principal outlet for scholarly articles on Asian societies published by the Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.
15684849, 15685314
Confucius Institute in the Sino-Thai relations: A display of China’s soft power
