Every year, approximately 3,500 new titles are suggested for inclusion in Scopus, but only 33% of those titles meet the technical criteria. And of those roughly 1,200 titles, only 50% are accepted after CSAB review. The form for the criteria can be found here.
Authors should specifically know that valid Scopus sites are expected to adhere to the following:
1.
A
journal's website, including the text that it contains, shall demonstrate that
care has been taken to ensure high ethical and professional standards. It must
not contain information that might mislead readers or authors, including any
attempt to mimic another journal/publisher’s site. An ‘Aims & Scope’ statement should be included
on the website and the readership
clearly defined. There should be a statement on what a journal will
consider for publication including authorship criteria (e.g., not considering
multiple submissions, redundant publications) to be included. ISSNs should be clearly displayed
(separate for print and electronic).
2.
The
Journal name shall be unique
and not be one that is easily confused with another journal or that might
mislead potential authors and readers about the Journal’s origin or association
with other journals.
3.
Journal content must be clearly
marked as whether peer reviewed or not. Peer review is defined as obtaining
advice on individual manuscripts from reviewers expert in the field who are not
part of the journal’s editorial staff. This process, as well as any policies
related to the journal’s peer review procedures, shall be clearly described on
the journal website, including the method of peer review used. Journal websites should not
guarantee manuscript acceptance or very short peer review times.
4.
Information
about the ownership and/or
management of a journal shall be clearly indicated on the journal’s website.
Publishers shall not use organizational or journal names that would mislead
potential authors and editors about the nature of the journal’s owner.
5.
Journals shall have editorial boards or
other governing bodies whose members are recognized experts in the subject
areas included within the journal’s scope. The full names and affiliations of
the journal’s editorial board or other governing body shall be provided on the
journal’s website.
6.
Journals shall provide the full names and
affiliations of the journal’s editors on the journal website as well as contact information for
the editorial office, including a full address.
7.
The
policy for copyright shall be clearly stated in the author guidelines and the copyright holder named on all
published articles. Likewise, licensing information shall be clearly
described in guidelines on the website, and licensing terms shall be indicated
on all published articles, both HTML and PDFs. If authors are allowed to
publish under a Creative Commons license then any specific license requirements
shall be noted. Any policies on posting of final accepted versions or published
articles on third party repositories shall be clearly stated.
8.
Any
fees or charges that
are required for manuscript processing and/or publishing materials in the
journal shall be clearly stated
in a place that is easy for
potential authors to find prior to submitting their manuscripts for
review or explained to authors before they begin preparing their manuscript for
submission. If no such fees
are charged that should also be clearly stated.
9.
Publishers
and editors shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication
of papers where research misconduct has occurred, including plagiarism,
citation manipulation, and data falsification/fabrication, among others. In no
case shall a journal or its editors encourage such misconduct, or knowingly
allow such misconduct to take place. In the event that a journal’s publisher or
editors are made aware of any allegation of research misconduct relating to a
published article in their journal, the publisher or editor shall follow COPE’s
guidelines (or equivalent) in dealing with allegations.
10.
A
journal shall also have policies on publishing ethics. These should be clearly
visible on its website, and should refer to: i) Journal policies on authorship
and contributorship; ii) How the journal will handle complaints and appeals;
iii) Journal policies on conflicts of interest / competing interests; iv)
Journal policies on data sharing and reproducibility; v) Journal’s policy on
ethical oversight; vi) Journal’s policy on intellectual property; and vii)
Journal’s options for post-publication discussions and corrections.
11.
The
periodicity at which a journal
publishes shall be clearly indicated.
12.
The
way(s) in which the journal and individual articles are available to readers
and whether there are associated subscription or pay per view fees shall be stated.
13.
A
journal’s plan for electronic
backup and preservation of access to the journal content (for example,
access to main articles via CLOCKSS or PubMed Central) in the event a journal is no longer
published shall be clearly indicated.
14.
Business
models or revenue sources
(e.g., author fees, subscriptions, advertising, reprints, institutional
support, and organizational support) shall be clearly stated or otherwise evident on the journal’s
website. Publishing fees or waiver status should not influence editorial
decision making.
15.
Journals
shall state their advertising policy if relevant, including what types of
adverts will be considered, who makes decisions regarding accepting adverts and
whether they are linked to content or reader behaviour (online only) or are
displayed at random. Advertisements should not be related in any way to
editorial decision making and shall be kept separate from the published
content.
16.
Any direct marketing activities, including
solicitation of manuscripts that are conducted on behalf of the journal, shall
be appropriate, well targeted, and unobtrusive. Information provided about the publisher or journal
is expected to be truthful and not misleading for readers or authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment